logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2015.02.12 2012가합9396
손해배상등
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The status of the parties is the president of the F Hospital located in Ansan-si E (hereinafter “Defendant Hospital”); Defendant C is the head of the Defendant Hospital; Defendant D is the head of the Defendant Hospital; Defendant D is the head of the chest branch of the Defendant Hospital.

On April 11, 2011, the Plaintiff was a person who was first admitted to the Defendant Hospital and received an exhumationing surgery on April 20, 2011, and was subject to an exhumationing, exhumationing, exhumationing, etc. over several times from March 19, 2012.

B. Around 15:00 on April 11, 201, the Plaintiff, including the process of the instant first and second surgery, was admitted to an emergency room in the Silung Hospital located in G at the address of Silung, and was hospitalized after being sent to the emergency room in the Defendant hospital at around 17:11 on the same day on the same day, who is suspected of being exposed to non-STS dystrefing.

Medical personnel of the Defendant Hospital performed an ornamental becopic surgery against the Plaintiff on April 12, 201, and found the Plaintiff’s symptoms to be non-STS-copic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic. From around 08:00 on April 20, 201 to around 17:00, the medical personnel of the Defendant Hospital connects the Plaintiff with an alternative blood scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic sc

(hereinafter “instant primary operation”) performed.

However, at around 02:00 on April 21, 201, the part in which the Plaintiff is scarkes between the scarke and the right of the scarke, the forward part of which is the chest, the rear part, the lower part of which is the beam.

After the blood transfusion is observed, the medical personnel of the Defendant Hospital performed re-operation for the blood transfusion from 03:00 to 05:30 on the same day (hereinafter “instant secondary surgery”), and thereafter, the Plaintiff discharged the Plaintiff from the Defendant Hospital on May 12, 201.

C. On May 30, 201, the Plaintiff filed an appeal for the pain pain and pain in the operation with the Defendant Hospital at the time of the instant third surgery, and the medical professionals at the Defendant Hospital prescribed the Plaintiff with respect to the antibiotics and chronic medication for oral use.

Since then on June 8, 201, the plaintiff is re-paid.

arrow