1. The Defendant’s KRW 26,089,850 as well as the Plaintiff’s annual rate of 5% from January 22, 2013 to February 7, 2017, and the following.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. A. The relevant medical knowledge ① galm sewage; galmopic galmopic galmopic galmopic galmopically, the upper eyebris below the upper eyebris. ② Operational method; galmical gropic gropical grcropical grcropic glars located in the rear bank; and the method of operation of internal sewage is fixed to the gropic gropic gropical gropter, or to the gropic gropic gropic gropter, or to the gropic gropical gropical gropic gropical grhetor, which is located below the part of the edge of the visual gropic grhetor).

B. On January 14, 2013, the Plaintiff was consulted on the process of the first surgery with the DNA sewage type surgery conducted by the Defendant in Gangnam-gu Seoul (hereinafter “Defendant Hospital”).

On January 22, 2013, the Plaintiff received, from the Defendant Hospital, both sides, the 2010 Formula 10, the right-hand laging, the right-hand laging, the right-hand laging, and the 2010 Formula 10.

(hereinafter referred to as the "first operation"). Since then, it was found that snow booms were found that snow boomed in the left eye, and that there were no symptoms and snow that do not leave.

C. On February 8, 2013, the defendant, after the second surgery, restored the first surgery department to the left-hand side for the treatment of symptoms No. 1, 2013, and transplanted artificial diagnosis board with an artificial diagnosis board, and re-execution of an autopsy, sewage, and correction surgery.

(hereinafter referred to as “the second surgery”). Since then, the Plaintiff continued to receive treatment for recovery from the Defendant hospital, but the Plaintiff continued to suffer from symptoms that do not leave the left eye, and generated solid and brudial symptoms. D.

On June 19, 2013, the defendant removed the artificial dice dice in the second operation to treat dices, and in this process, the defendant had removed the fixed room at the time of the second operation and carried out the dice dice dice dice dice dice again after removing it.

hereinafter referred to as "third operation".

In light of the legal principles as seen earlier, the Plaintiff’s ground of appeal is without merit.