logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 춘천지방법원 속초지원 2019.05.29 2019고단104
범인도피등
Text

1. Defendant A shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the above sentence shall be executed for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendant A

A. On March 16, 2019, around 02:10, the Defendant also made a false statement as if the Defendant driven the said car in front of the D Apartment House at the Seocho-si, Seocho-si, with the knowledge of the fact that the Defendant was making a traffic accident while driving a drinking or without a license. However, even though the Defendant did not drive the Efran vehicle, the Defendant made a false statement to G, etc. belonging to the F Zone Group of the Seocho Police Station, which was called to investigate the instant car upon receiving the report of 112 that the traffic accident occurred due to the said car, and had B leave the site of the traffic accident.

As a result, the defendant got the criminal defendant to escape B who committed a crime corresponding to a fine or heavier punishment.

B. The obstruction of performance of official duties, the damage of property, etc.: (a) at the time and place mentioned in the above Paragraph (1) above; and (b) at the time and place, the Defendant assaulted the face of the above G at one time in order to arrest the Defendant as a flagrant offender under the suspicion of criminal escape; (c) at the same time, he tried to confirm the inside of the Efranchis which he driven by B in order to verify the identity of B, including the circumstances belonging to the F Zone G (49 years of age) of the Seocho Police Station, etc. (hereinafter referred to as the “F Zone 49 years of age”) who was called out after having received a report on the occurrence of the traffic accident; and (d) thereby preventing the Defendant from confirming the inside the said car.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties concerning the arrest of a police officer, and at the same time damaged the victim's property.

2. On March 16, 2019, Defendant B agreed to the victim H in cash 200,000 won for the traffic accident that he/she caused on or around 02:00, the Defendant agreed to the victim H in front of the D apartment house, but the victim refused to do so, and the Defendant’s behavior, such as C and I, is the victim’s “s chexe.”

I now know.

arrow