Plaintiff and appellant
Korea Tourism Institute (Law Firm & one other, Counsel for the defendant-appellant)
Defendant, Appellant
Governor of Jeollabuk-do
Intervenor joining the Defendant
Jeonbuk High-speed Co., Ltd. and one other (Law Firm Barun, Attorney Kim Jong-hoon, Counsel for the plaintiff-appellant)
Conclusion of Pleadings
November 7, 2016
The first instance judgment
Jeonju District Court Decision 2015Guhap2076 Decided July 21, 2016
Text
1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff, including the costs of supplementary participation.
Purport of claim and appeal
The judgment of the first instance court is revoked. In the first instance court, it is confirmed that the defendant's disposition of approving the modification of the passenger transport business plan on October 6, 2015 with respect to the former North Speed Co., Ltd. is nonexistent, and the defendant's disposition of approving the modification of the passenger transport business plan on October 6, 2015 is revoked in the first instance court. In the second instance, the defendant's disposition of approving the modification of the passenger transport business plan on October 6, 2015 with respect to the former North Speed Co., Ltd. and the North Gohap-
Reasons
1. Quotation of the first instance judgment
The court's explanation on this case is the same as the statement of the reasons for the judgment of the court of first instance, and thus, citing this as is in accordance with Article 8 (2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act
2. Conclusion
Therefore, all of the plaintiff's primary and conjunctive claims are dismissed as they are without merit, and the judgment of the court of first instance is just, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.
Judges Noh Jeong-hee (Presiding Judge)