logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대법원 2018. 01. 31. 선고 2017두63429 판결
(심리불속행) 양도소득세의 대주주 요건 판단시 시가 100억원 이상은 보통주와 우선주를 구별하지 않음[국승]
Case Number of the immediately preceding lawsuit

Seoul High Court-2017-Nu-47344 ( December 22, 2017)

Case Number of the previous trial

Cho High Court Decision 2015No504 (2016.03)

Title

(In determining the requirements for major shareholders of the capital gains tax, the market price of at least 10 billion won is not distinguished from the common shares and the preferential shares.

Summary

(Summary of the Judgment of the Supreme Court) There is no express provision that restricts stocks subject to taxation from large shareholders of listed stocks to common shares, and there is no reason to exclude preferential shares for the purpose of legislation.

Related statutes

Article 92 (Scope of Transfer Income Tax)

Enforcement Decree of the Income Tax Act Article 94 (Scope of Securities Prepaid Securities and Large Stockholders)

Cases

2017Du63429 Revocation of Disposition of Imposing capital gains tax

Plaintiff-Appellant

leAA

Defendant-Appellee

BB Director of the Tax Office

Judgment of the lower court

September 22, 2017

Imposition of Judgment

January 31, 2018

Text

The appeal is dismissed.

The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiff.

Reasons

The records of this case and the judgment of the court below and the grounds of appeal were examined. However, the grounds of appeal on the grounds of appeal are not included in the grounds provided for in each subparagraph of Article 4(1) of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Procedure of Appeal, and the appeal is dismissed pursuant to Article 5 of the same Act. It is so decided as per Disposition

arrow