logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대법원 2014. 09. 16. 선고 2014두37603 판결
(심리불속행)3년 이상 자경하였는지 및 양도 당시 농지였는지를 인정할 증거가 없음[국승]
Case Number of the immediately preceding lawsuit

Daejeon High Court 2013Nu3311 (Law No. 124, 2014)

Title

(C) There is no evidence to acknowledge whether the farmland was farmland at the time of the transfer and whether the farmland was farmland for at least three years.

Summary

(1) According to the summary of the aviation photographs, there is no evidence to acknowledge that the instant land was farmland at the time of the transfer, in view of the following: (a) there is no evidence to acknowledge that the instant land was farmland at the time of the transfer, and that the Plaintiff used the instant land as a parking lot and a road on the door-to-face.

Cases

2014Du37603 Revocation of Disposition of Imposing capital gains tax

Plaintiff-Appellant

IsaA

Defendant-Appellee

Head of Busan District Tax Office

Judgment of the lower court

Daejeon High Court Decision 2013Nu3311 Decided April 24, 2014

Text

The appeal is dismissed.

The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiff.

Reasons

All of the records of this case and the judgment of the court below and the grounds of appeal were examined, but the appellant's grounds of appeal are not included in the grounds provided for in each subparagraph of Article 4 (1) of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Procedure for Appeal, and the appeal is dismissed pursuant to Article 5 of the same Act. It is so decided as per Disposition by

arrow