1. The plaintiff's claim that was changed in exchange in this court is dismissed.

2. The Plaintiff’s total costs of litigation.

The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, which accepted the judgment, is as follows, is the same as the part of the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for using partial contents as set forth in the following paragraph (2) and adding some contents as set forth in the following paragraph (3). As such, Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act shall be cited as it is. The part to be filled by the court of first instance, which is set forth in the judgment,

After that, the defendant issued a disposition to extend the period of prohibition of departure from January 1, 2017 to June 30, 2017 with respect to the plaintiff, and the defendant issued a disposition to extend the period of prohibition of departure from January 1, 2017 to June 30, 2017 (hereinafter referred to as the "disposition in this case") from January 1, 2018 to June 30, 2018.

On the 2nd page of the first instance judgment, the phrase “2. The lawfulness of the instant disposition” in the 16th sentence is understood as “3. The legality of the instant disposition”.

In the first instance judgment, the part 6 through 8 of the first instance judgment states, “The first instance judgment entered China or Vietnam at a total of seven times from September 28, 201 to July 23, 2014, and five times from July 19, 2016 to January 13, 2017, each of which entered Vietnam at a total of five times” as “the departure from China, the Philippines, or Vietnam at least eight times from August 11, 201 to April 1, 2014,” respectively.

Part 6 of the judgment of the first instance, “from April 201 to February 2012, and from March 2017, to March 2017,” set forth in Part 4 as “from April 2011 to February 2012 and from March 2017 to March 2017.”

On the 6th judgment of the court of first instance, the 12th judgment shows "the 6th judgment" and "the 6th judgment shows".

shall not be held.

In addition, the following shall be added to the second part of the judgment of the first instance, the second part of the judgment, 15:

"2. Judgment on the Defendant's defense prior to the merits

A. The Defendant’s assertion that the Plaintiff received the instant disposition on January 4, 2018, from the Plaintiff.