logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 청주지방법원 2020.08.13 2020고단468
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(위험운전치상)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Bodily Injury resulting from Dangerous Driving) is a person engaged in driving B K7 automobiles

On February 1, 2020, the Defendant driven the above vehicle under the influence of alcohol on February 1, 2020, and continued the front of the office gate in the direction of the office gate in the Heung-gu Seoul Metropolitan City.

In this case, a driver of a motor vehicle has a duty of care to take the front side and left side well and to accurately manipulate the steering and brakes so as to prevent accidents.

Nevertheless, under the influence of alcohol, the Defendant was negligent in driving the front part of the e-mail cleaning vehicle driven by the victim D (Nam, 50 years old) from the entrance of the said officetel due to the negligence going beyond the center line, and received the front part of the e-mail cleaning vehicle.

Ultimately, the Defendant driving the said vehicle under the influence of alcohol that it is difficult for the Defendant to drive the said vehicle normally, and suffered injury to the victim F, who was on the back side of the damaged vehicle, such as climatic salt, tension, etc. for about two weeks, and suffered injury to the victim F, who was on the back side of the damaged vehicle, for about three weeks of medical treatment.

2. The Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act (Refusal of measurement) caused the above traffic accidents at the time and place specified in paragraph (1).

The Defendant had reasonable grounds to recognize that he driven B K7 cars while under the influence of alcohol, such as he/she was breathed with snow at the time, walked with a light, walked with a light, and unable to walk properly, etc., and was demanded to comply with a drinking test by inserting it into a drinking measuring instrument three times from H on the same day from 04:07 to 04:12 of the same day from H on the same day, while the Defendant did not comply with a police officer’s request for a drinking test without justifiable grounds.

Summary of Evidence

1...

arrow