1. The Defendant is not in compliance with the Plaintiff’s 79 square meters of the land of the Kugdong-gu Kugdong-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City and the Plaintiff’s 4,137 square meters of the land.

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff, the Defendant, the E, the F, and G shared the land of the Hdong (hereinafter referred to as “all land”) located in Hdong-gu, Young-si, Young-si (hereinafter referred to as “Hdong”).

B. On August 208, 2008, the Plaintiff filed a lawsuit of partition of co-owned property on the I land against Defendant, E, F, and G as the court 2006Gadan89271, and divided the I land into J land, K land, D land, L land, M land, M land, and C. The J land is F, K land, G for D land, and D land, the Plaintiff, for the Defendant, for land M, for land M, and for land E, and for E and F.

As to this, the above decision (hereinafter referred to as the “instant mediation protocol”) became final and conclusive because the parties did not raise any objection, and the contents of the instant mediation protocol concerning C land are as follows:

3. The consent of the Plaintiff, the Defendant, and the E, and the F, to use the C Forest land on a scale of 106 square meters, to each other, to waive the claim for land use fees, and to the consent of co-owners necessary for the future use of the land.

5. The Plaintiff, the Defendant, the E, F, and G shall deliver the required documents within seven days from the time of receipt of written notice by the co-owner or G requesting the consent, and shall affix their seals to the documents necessary for the consent, if any situation requiring the written consent of the remaining co-owners concerning the consent to use of forest land of 106 square meters for C forest land. If delay is delayed without justifiable grounds, delay damages calculated at the rate of three hundred thousand won per day to one co-owner or G requesting the consent

C. Pursuant to the instant protocol, I was divided into six parcels of land J or C in accordance with the instant protocol of mediation.

With respect to the whole share of D land from November 18, 2008 to 20th of the same month, the Plaintiff’s future as to the whole share of M land is either E or C.