logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2018.12.06 2018나6289
부당이득금 반환청구의 소
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff, including the costs of supplementary participation.

Reasons

1. The grounds for appeal by the plaintiff citing the judgment of the court of first instance are not significantly different from the allegations in the court of first instance, and even if the evidence submitted to the court of first instance and the court of first instance are examined, the fact-finding and judgment of the court of

Therefore, the reasoning of the judgment of this court is identical to the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the dismissal as follows, and thus, it is accepted in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420

2. The appellate court’s fourth 11th tier judgment on the part of the judgment of the first instance states “the Plaintiff” as “the Defendant.”

The fourth part of the judgment of the first instance is referring to the 18th class "Grain" as the "Graina".

The defendant against the 6th instance judgment of the first instance court is "as to the 6th instance judgment," and the plaintiff is "as to the 5th instance judgment."

The argument by the Defendant in Part 15 of the judgment of the court of first instance is deemed to be “the Plaintiff’s allegation above”.

3. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow