1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff owned 1st 237.13 square meters of 237.13 square meters of 284.90 square meters of 1st 2nd 2nd 2nd 2nd 2nd 2nd 2nd 2nd 2nd 2nd 2nd 37.90 square meters of 1st 2nd 2nd 2nd 2nd 38.672 square meters of public restaurants, 24.78 square meters of prefabricated type 24.78 square meters of prefabricated type 2nd 2nd 3nd 2nd 2nd 5.94 square meters of prefabricated type 2nd 2nd 3nd 3nd 2nd 2nd 2nd 2nd 52nd 72nd 361 square meters of 1st 36th 4th 27th 27th 27th 2 of 2012 of 2nd 2nd 206.

B. On April 195, 195, E newly constructed a steel structure, fluoring brick structure, concrete sloped sloping roof, 264m2, 264m2, and 72m2 in a 2nd floor white room (hereinafter “the instant additional 1 building”). Since then, the Plaintiff’s ownership registration for the instant additional 1 building was completed in the future.

C. On December 23, 1997, the Plaintiff extended the building of 202.08 square meters and 264.69 square meters for the first floor of the steel-frame to connect the said two buildings with the building attached to the Samdong-dong and the instant additional 1 building (hereinafter “the instant additional 2 building”).

Therefore, the building ledger of the existing building of this case was changed to Ddong as shown below.

(hereinafter “instant new building Ddong”). Following such extension, F, the site of the instant additional 1 building, was added to the parcel number of the entire site of the instant new building. The building register of the instant additional 1 building was deleted.

(On the other hand, the registry of the instant additional 1 building remains as it remains, and it appears to have been closed on the grounds of “damage” during the G auction procedure in this court as seen below. The Do-type Do-dong Do-dong general restaurant of 144.00 Do-dong Do-dong Do-dong Do-dong Do-dong Do-dong Do-dong Do-dong Do-dong Do-dong Do-dong Do-dong Do-dong Do-dong