logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2018.11.07 2018고단5505
사문서위조등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On October 29, 2014, the Defendant issued a summary order of KRW 3 million for a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act at the Seoul Central District Court on March 29, 201, and a summary order of KRW 4 million for the same crime on January 23, 2018.

1. The Defendant did not obtain a driver’s license, who violated the Road Traffic Act (drinking) and the Road Traffic Act (drawing without a license) on two or more occasions, against Article 44(1) of the Road Traffic Act.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, while under the influence of alcohol content of 00:30 on May 20, 2018, driven a car in FHE20d from the front of the “C cafeteria” road located in Seongbuk-gu, Sungnam-si, Sungnam-si, to the front of the “E” road located in D.

2. On May 20, 2018, the Defendant: (a) reported on May 20, 2011, on the front day of the “E”, and discovered the occurrence of drinking alcohol to H, a police officer belonging to the G District Unit in the Gyeonggi-gu Police Station G District, which was called out, the Defendant was subject to punishment as if he/she was a punishment, and was subject to investigation.

Defendant stated in the above date, at the above place, that “I” and in the content column of the statement, “A vehicle is parked with approximately 10 meters in the load of night driver and fee-related with it on May 20, 2018,” and signed I at the bottom.

The Defendant continued to deliver the forged statement to the above H as if it were the document duly formed.

Accordingly, for the purpose of exercising, the Defendant forged a copy of the I’s private document, which is a private document to prove facts, and exercised it.

3. The Defendant forged the signature of the company and signed the above investigation to the effect that, at the time and place of Paragraph 2, the Defendant’s circumstantial report prepared by the J concerning the situation of the driver’s vehicle belonging to the G District of the Gyeonggi Police Station, “as to confirm that the entries, such as the result of drinking alcohol measurement, are true.”

arrow