beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
1. On September 26, 2016, the Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act (Non-licenseless Driving) driven a 38 km MZ car at approximately 38 km, i.e., e., a 1115 U.S. Mac-ro Mac-ro Mac-ro from the front side of the 1115 U.S. Mac-ro Mac-ro Mac-ro Mac-ro Mac-ro Mac-ro Mac-ro Mac-ro Mac-ro Mac-ro Mac-ro Mac-ro Madi
2. The Defendant violated the Resident Registration Act: (a) on the day and night as set forth in the above 1. paragraph (1) of this Article, the Defendant: (b) controlled a person who was under the control of a police station G patrol box in the Gyeonggi-gu Police Station G patrol box, and was demanded to present a driver’s license; and (c) stated that the driver’s license was revoked due to drinking, the Defendant was the Defendant’s resident registration number, which was known to the ordinary place and was the Defendant’s resident registration number.
Accordingly, the defendant used the I's resident registration number unlawfully.
3. The Defendant, like the foregoing 2.2., stated that the Defendant was aware of the charge of violating the Motor Vehicle Management Act and received a voluntary accompanying request on the ground that he did not make a transfer registration of a motor vehicle from the said H, and the Defendant was aware of the fact that he was in suspicion of violating the Motor Vehicle Management Act. On September 26, 2016, the Defendant was in the above G box located in Seongbuk-gu, Seongbuk-gu, Sung-si, Sung-si, Sung-si, Seoul, on the following occasions: (a) the Defendant was carrying the completion of the construction; (b) on August 2016, the Defendant stated that he was an “I” and was operating the instant motor vehicle after having received a monthly payment from A around August 2016; and (c) on September 26, 2016, the Defendant was aware of the name “I” and signed the name “I” next to the Defendant’s voluntary accompanying consent.
Accordingly, the defendant forged I's signature for the purpose of exercising, and used forged I's signature.
4. On September 2016, the Defendant continued to use a private document forgery and a falsified investigation document.