logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 안산지원 2013.08.14 2012고정2483
모욕등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A (31 years of age, remaining) is a person who is engaged in self-business.

1. Around 05:40 on July 29, 2012, the Defendant, on the front side of the “DPC bank” located in Ansan-si, Sinsan-si, Annsan-si, providing a receipt to calculate game expenses on the PC bank.” On the outside of the case of “DPC bank”, the Defendant publicly insulting the victim G employed in the F District of the Ansan-gu Police Station F District, the police officer of the Ansan-gu, who was called out after receiving a report from E, with the view to “the police officer evaded taxes,” and, among the circumstances surrounding H and reporter, the Defendant, who was the police officer of the same fee, was h and e, h.b., “F., f., f., f., f., f., f., f., f., f.,”

2. 공무집행방해 피고인은 위‘가’항과 같이 모욕죄로 현행범인 체포되어 순찰차량 뒷자리에 탑승한 후 피해자인 순경 I와 함께 F지구대로 타고 오던 중 “씨발놈아 니네들이 뭔데 나를 데려가냐. 좃같은 새끼야”라고 욕설을 하며, 피해자의 오른쪽 안면부위를 머리로 1회 들이받는 폭행을 하여 경찰관의 정당한 공무집행을 방해하였다.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each legal statement of witness G, I and E;

1. Sound CDs;

1. Application of related Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant Article 311 of the Criminal Act, Articles 136 (1) and 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of each fine for the crime;

2. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

3. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse.

4. As to the assertion of the Defendant, etc. under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, the Defendant and his/her defense counsel asserted that the Defendant did not commit any assault by taking the Defendant’s inside and outside part of the police officer I as his/her hair, and even if he/she received his/her hair, the Defendant’s conduct of the Defendant was illegal arrest and thus, the crime of obstruction of performance of official duties

Any person may arrest a flagrant offender without a warrant.

arrow