The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

The Defendant appealed on the ground that the Defendant was too unreasonable due to the lower court’s punishment (one year of imprisonment). However, in light of all the sentencing conditions and the records of the instant case including the following: (a) the extent of damage caused by each of the instant crimes was small; (b) the damage was not recovered in addition to the partial seizure of the damaged goods; and (c) the Defendant had a number of criminal records, including the fact that the Defendant was punished by imprisonment with labor, it is not deemed that the sentence imposed on the Defendant for the reasons stated in its reasoning is too unreasonable.

Since the appeal by the defendant is groundless, it is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.

However, pursuant to Article 25 (1) of the Regulation on Criminal Procedure, "H" in Article 25 (2) of the judgment of the court below shall be changed ex officio to "AD", and "E name" in Article 25 (2) of the judgment of the court below to "E name" in Article 25 (1) of the Regulation on Criminal Procedure shall be changed to "E name."