logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 제주지방법원 2021.01.21 2020노251
도로교통법위반(무면허운전)
Text

The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

Reasons

The Defendant appealed on the ground that the lower court’s punishment (six months of imprisonment) was too excessive and unfair, but there were a large number of criminal records of the Defendant, in particular, in light of all the sentencing conditions indicated in the records and theories of changes, including the fact that the Defendant committed the instant crime without being aware of the fact that the Defendant had committed the instant crime even during the period of repeated crime due to the same kind of crime, even though considering the fact that the Defendant disposed of a non-licensed driver’s vehicle to another person, the Defendant’s family relationship, economic situation, etc., it is not recognized that the sentence imposed by the lower court

Since the appeal by the defendant is groundless, it is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.

However, pursuant to Article 25 (1) of the Regulation on Criminal Procedure, the "related photograph" of the 7th sentence of the judgment of the court below shall be taken into consideration as "on-site photograph, image closure photograph" in Article 25 (2) of the Regulation on Criminal Procedure, and the second page of the judgment of the court below shall be corrected as "the same crime" in the last page of the 2th sentence of the judgment of the court below as "the crime of violation of the Traffic Act (don-line driving) by

arrow