A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

In the support of the Daejeon District Court on December 5, 2014, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of two years in October and a fine of two hundred and five hundred thousand won in August 31, 201 as a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act at the Busan District Court's Busan District Court on March 201, and three times in the records of the same crime.

1. On March 5, 2017, the Defendant: (a) was under the influence of alcohol by around 07:41, the Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act; (b) on March 5, 2017, the Defendant driven B 5 km from the road front of the Busan-gu Busan-dong Gyeongdong Gungdong University to the road front of the Busan-dong Urban Highway Management Office.

As a result, the defendant has driven a motor vehicle under the influence of alcohol without a driver's license even though he has been under the influence of alcohol more than twice.

2. In front of the above highway management office, the Defendant: (a) controlled a person suspected of drinking or non-licensed driving; (b) was demanded by police officers D to verify his/her identity; and (c) presented his/her official document under the name of the Commissioner General of the Cheongnam-gu National Police Agency in the Busan Coast Guard, as if he/she was the Defendant’s driver’s license; and (d) illegally displayed his/her official document.

3. The Defendant, at the time and place specified in Paragraph 2, controlled the suspicion of drinking and non-licensed driving as above, and was demanded by police officers D to sign a report on the situation statement of the driver under the circumstances of the driver under the influence of drinking, etc. on the basis of E’s license, etc., and submitted E’s signature and submitted it to the name following the Defendant.

Accordingly, for the purpose of exercising authority, the defendant has forged a false statement report on the situation of the driver in the name of E, which is a private document to prove facts without authority, and has issued it to D who is aware of the forgery.