Defendant

A Imprisonment for one year, and each of the defendants B shall be punished by imprisonment for ten months.

However, this decision is delivered to the Defendants.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A From June 2013, in 2013, from Yanandong-gu, Seocheon-gu, the F industrial company, a comprehensive truck repair business entity, operated the F industrial company. Defendant B, from September 2014 to August 2015, served as a management director who exercises overall control over the overall affairs of the F industrial company, such as the calculation of vehicle repair and estimate, claim for insurance proceeds, etc.

In the case of large-scale cargo vehicles, such as dump trucks and ready-mixeds entered into an insured accident, there was a circumstance that the amount of insurance proceeds would be significantly reduced compared to the claim amount according to the internal review procedure and the payment standard of insurance proceeds when the insurance company claims the repair expenses for the insurance company. Meanwhile, each insurance company did not actually confirm or examine whether the documents submitted by the Defendants were true or not, and there was no way to verify or examine the documents submitted by the Defendants only based on the documents submitted by the Defendants.

The Defendants planned to receive insurance money by deceiving an insurance company by claiming the payment of false repair cost or by paying the delivery unit price or repair cost, using the above payment procedure.

1. Defendant A, along with G G, the factory head of the above F Industry Company (Death on October 19, 2015), conspired to receive insurance proceeds by deceiving an insurance company by filing a false claim for insurance proceeds, as if the parts were replaced by a new product even if the parts were not replaced even if the parts were not replaced even if the parts were not actually repaired, Defendant A was able to receive the insurance proceeds by using a false statement, estimate, etc. as if the parts were replaced by a new product even though the parts were replaced by a new product.

Accordingly, the Defendant at around July 8, 2013 along with the above G, received the insurance money from the F.F. Industrial Company (“F.”).