Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 7,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant, at the Jeonjin-gu, Seoul Special Metropolitan City, Inc., Ltd., B Jeonju service center located in Seoul Special Metropolitan City, which is directly managed by the Defendant in merz. B, shall first confirm the damaged parts of the vehicle involved in the accident and calculate the approximate repair details and cost (tentatively called 's 's 's 's 's 's 's 's 's 's ') to the service center computer network (Dms), and then requested payment guarantee to the person in charge of the insurance company of the accident, and requested payment guarantee from the person in charge of the insurance company, ordered the mechanic to repair the vehicle, and confirmed the repair details such as the replacement of parts when the repair of the vehicle involved in the accident is completed, and charged with the insurance company with the repair cost.

Although the Defendant had confirmed the details of the actual vehicle repair when claiming repair costs to the insurance company, using the fact that he had already received payment guarantee from the insurance company for the “pre-paid estimate” for the purpose of increasing sales, etc., the Defendant prepared a written estimate as if he had exchanged the parts that have not been actually exchanged, or prepared a written estimate to raise the value of the parts, and acquired the insurance proceeds accordingly.

On October 14, 2014, the Defendant accepted DWz E300 vehicles suffering from an accident, and then claimed insurance money to the victim Samsung T&T Co., Ltd. for insurance proceeds, the Defendant: (a) confirmed that parts, such as part number:03331071); (b) seeing light (part number: 21230135); and (c) tyrept (part number: 21230135); and (d) confirmed the condition that parts, such as a tyre valve (part number: : 004000213), were not damaged due to an accident, and exchanged the said parts due to an accident, notwithstanding the fact that the parts were not damaged due to an accident.

A false claim was made.

When the Defendant claimed repair expenses for the foregoing vehicle to the victim, the Defendant would normally exchange parts, such as valves, as above.