(영문) 대전지방법원 2017.07.13 2017고정693

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 대전지방법원 2017.07.13 2017고정693

업무상배임등

Text

Defendants shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

In the event that the Defendants did not pay the above fine, 100.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A is the chairperson of the Daejeon Sung-gu Committee for Management of Building C from early 2015 to early 2015, and Defendant B is the person who served as the vice chairperson of the management committee from August 1, 2015 to the above management committee.

1. Forgery of private documents and the uttering of a falsified investigation document;

A. A. Around August 2015, the Defendants forged the “D quotation” (1) confirmed that the estimate amount of the “D” in the construction company, compared to the estimate amount of 9 million won among the construction companies, was 6.3 million won, compared to the estimate amount of the “D” among the construction companies in relation to the installation of the elevator air conditioners of the C building, the Defendants revised the quotation amount of the “D” at a price lower than the estimate amount of the “D”, and conspired to use the difference for the management operating expenses of the Committee and personal purposes.

Accordingly, on August 2015, the Defendants added 2,750,000 won to the “basic name name” column, and added 3,13,000 won, 198,000 won, 334,000 won, 334,000 won, and 5,50,000 won to the “amount” column, and deleted 6,26,26,000 won, 396,000 won, 66,68,000 won, 668,000 won, 668,000 won, 6668,000 won, 668,000 won, 668,000 won, 668,000 won, 705,80 won, 705,000 won to the “unit price” column, and deleted 5,50,000 won to the “amount” column.

As a result, the Defendants conspired to forge a letter of estimate in the name of “D”, which is a private document related to rights and obligations, for the purpose of uttering.

(2) The Defendants at the event of the said investigation document submitted a written estimate in the name of “D”, which was forged at the time and place specified in paragraph (1) of the same Article, to the managing director E.

B. (1) The Defendants who forged private documents forged a written estimate related to disaster prevention and expansion works (1) shall be the other companies to receive construction cost already paid in relation to C’s reconstruction works around August 2015.

유사 판례

-서울중앙지방법원 2018.11.07 2017고단8277

-수원지방법원 안양지원 2017.02.09 2016고정437

-제주지방법원 2018.06.22 2018고정10

-대구지방법원 서부지원 2018.10.25 2018고정279

-대전지방법원 2017.05.17 2016고단3656