1. The defendant A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for ten months.

However, the above sentence shall be executed for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A appears to be a clerical error in the indictment on March 29, 2016, which appears to be " March 29, 2017," in which the D Management Group's administrator (chairperson) in Jung-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government is selected.

A candidate who is going to an election is a candidate.

1. At the beginning of March, 2016, the Defendant: (a) received a letter of delegation from the custodian E to “E” with respect to the exercise of voting rights at a management assembly; and (b) used the personal information of the sectional owners as indicated in the power of delegation, Defendant A expressed a new letter of delegation to the effect that the said sectional owners delegate voting rights to “A” who is the Defendant.

In March 2016, the Defendant, at the office D Management Unit, had FF, who was unaware of the fact that the Defendant prepared a new power of attorney without authority, enter “G”, “H”, “K”, and “K” in the column for the location of a separate store in the column for the name of the delegating form written by the mandatory, and forged the delegation of 17 copies in the aggregate, as shown in the attached crime list, by forcing FF, who was aware of the fact that the Defendant was to prepare a new power of attorney without authority, to enter “G”, “H”, “K” in the column for the name of the delegating form written by the mandatory, “K”, and “B”, respectively.

Accordingly, the defendant, for the purpose of exercising authority, forged 17 letter of delegation, which is a private document on rights and obligations.

2. On March 28, 2016, around 17:00 on March 28, 2016, Defendant A issued a forged proxy form 17 to the members of the Committee on Election Management who did not know the forgery at a conference room of the Committee on Election Management, as prescribed in paragraph (1), and exercised the same.

3. Around March 28, 2016, the Defendant interfered with Defendant A’s business, at the conference room of the Committee on Management of D Election, used the forged 17 proxy form as a valid proxy for the election of an open administrator on March 29, 2016.

In this respect, the defendant judged that the power of delegation of D election commission is invalid by fraudulent means.