(영문) 의정부지방법원고양지원 2017.07.21 2015가단83708

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 의정부지방법원고양지원 2017.07.21 2015가단83708

손해배상(의)

Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. On August 12, 2013, the Plaintiff: (a) was admitted to the Korea National Health Insurance Hospital run by the Defendant (hereinafter “Defendant Hospital”); and (b) was diagnosed as the escape certificate of the 4-5 protruding signboard as a result of the inspection.

B. From around 16:00 to 18:00 on August 13, 2013, the Plaintiff received an inception surgery from Defendant Hospital at the Defendant Hospital (hereinafter “the first surgery”). (c) The Plaintiff was diagnosed as a pressure on the cT test by emitting the radioactive ray and the crite symptoms immediately after having undergone the first surgery; (d) around 03:00 on August 14, 2013, the Plaintiff was diagnosed as a result of the cT test that the cT test conducted an operation to remove the blood species from the crite of the crite surgery at Defendant Hospital (hereinafter “the second operation”).

After the first and second operations, the plaintiff confirmed the escape from the side of the side of the side of the side of the side of the side of the side of the side of the side of the side of the side of the plaintiff.

[Ground of recognition] The non-contentious facts, Gap evidence Nos. 1 and 2 (including the number of branch offices), the result of the physical examination entrusted to the director of Seoul Hospital at the Macheon-do Seoul University, the purport of the entire pleadings

2. The plaintiff's assertion and judgment

A. The defendant hospital asserted that the plaintiff's defendant hospital did not confirm whether the blood transfusion was proper during the first operation against the plaintiff, and caused the occurrence of the flasium, which led to the occurrence of the flasium, which led to the plaintiff's pressure, and the plaintiff's flasium 5th century aggravated, and the plaintiff's flasium 29,850,00, the remaining flasium escape certificate was confirmed. Thus, the defendant is obligated to pay the plaintiff losses incurred to the plaintiff, 6,95,96,90, the sum of the flasium treatment expenses, 3,400,000, and damages for delay.

B. In order to establish tort liability caused by mistake in medical practice, the duty of care in medical treatment is as general.

유사 판례

-서울중앙지방법원 2013.09.17 2010가합51920

-광주지방법원 2016.03.31 2015가합59698

-서울중앙지방법원 2014.01.22 2012가합528448

-부산지방법원 2015.05.01 2013가단39472

-수원지방법원 2018.07.03 2016가단513438