logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2016.03.31 2015가합59698
손해배상(의)
Text

1. The Defendants jointly share KRW 85,713,977 to Plaintiff A, and KRW 5,00,000 to Plaintiff B, and each of the above amounts.

Reasons

Facts of recognition

A. Plaintiff A as a party is the patient who was under the care of Defendant C, which was the head of the E Hospital (hereinafter “instant hospital”) and the 1,000 plenary surgery and the crypary surgery (hereinafter “the first surgery”), which is the negoical surgery, around August 7, 2012. Plaintiff B is the husband of the instant hospital, and Defendant D is the representative director of the instant hospital. (B) Plaintiff A was under medical treatment at G hospital. Plaintiff A was transferred to the instant hospital on August 7, 2012, and was diagnosed as the negoical escape certificate No. 5,00,000, and was conducted by Defendant C on August 7, 2012 (hereinafter “the instant hospital”). Plaintiff A was under the care of Defendant C’s head of the instant hospital, and was under the care of Defendant C’s head of the instant hospital, and was subject to the removal of Plaintiff C’s 1 and 2 of the instant surgery after the removal of Plaintiff C’s 1 and 2.

3) Even after the second surgery, Plaintiff A continuously complained of the pain and abnormal sense symptoms to the right, along with the pain of the operation department, and there was an obstacle to urinal activities due to the reduction of the sense of an anti-presidential medicine. 4) Plaintiff A was hospitalized in the instant hospital and discharged the hospital after being hospitalized until September 7, 2012 after the second surgery.

5) After the discharge from the instant hospital, Plaintiff A was diagnosed by the “Other spine vert, celethical disorder NOS accompanied by the nephical ppuri disease,” etc., and conducted pharmacologic treatment, physical therapy, physical therapy, and physical therapy, etc. due to the weakening’s influence as a result of the instant hospital and other hospitals including the instant hospital. 6) As a result of the court’s physical diagnosis of the hospital with respect to the instant hospital, the Plaintiff was given treatment to Plaintiff A, as a result of the instant court’s physical diagnosis of the hospital, and the vegetable disease was observed by both sides of the vegetable examination, and the vegetable disease was suspected of clinically mathic disease, and the Plaintiff was sexually vegetable and vegetable.

arrow