1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Basic facts

A. On July 17, 2015, the Plaintiff (1942), who was a doctor, was within the hospital located in Osan-si C, where the Defendant was working, due to the symptoms of low scam (radioactive scam), etc. in the fore and finite.

The defendant diagnosed the plaintiff's symptoms as the 4th, 5th and 5th et al., and the verte inverte invert, and the vertebrate escape.

B. On July 21, 2015, the Defendant: (a) carried out the lap signboard removal method and the partial lapary laping method to the Plaintiff.

(C) On July 27, 2015, the Plaintiff was released from the hospital on July 27, 2015. On July 29, 2015, the Plaintiff re-exploited the hospital, and was hospitalized in the hospital, and received treatment, such as antibiotics and disinfection. However, as a result of blood examination, the blood check continues, and there is a opinion that the IMA’s crypology might be doubtful in the surgery, the Defendant re-exploited the Plaintiff (hereinafter “second surgery”). However, on August 12, 2015, the Plaintiff performed the surgery once again (hereinafter “second surgery”).

After the second surgery, the Plaintiff received medical treatment from the E Hospital on August 17, 2015 after receiving the Defendant’s written opinion, and the doctor diagnosed the Plaintiff as infected by infection after the surgery on the climatic surgery (along-distance farming and light-free farming). On August 18, 2015, the Plaintiff transferred the Plaintiff to the F Hospital.

E. In F Hospital, the Plaintiff diagnosed the Plaintiff as entebrate chronitis Nos. 4, 5, 5, 1,000, and 1,000. On August 21, 2015, the F Hospital conducted cryptitis and creative washing, e.g., inc., inc., e., inc., e., e., inc., e., e., inc., e.,

On November 16, 2015, the Plaintiff discharged the Plaintiff from F Hospital.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, entry of Gap evidence 1 to 7, purport of the whole pleadings

2. Determination on the cause of the claim

A. The main point of the cause of the claim is that the Plaintiff received the first and second surgery from the Defendant, which is on the part of the surgery.