beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for up to six months.
However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
1. Embezzlements of deserted articles in possession;
A. On December 7, 2016, the Defendant found one credit card of one bank lost by the victim E on the way near Dtel located in the sphere of Suwon-si, Suwon-si, Suwon-si, at around KRW 17:30.
Defendant 1 did not take necessary procedures such as returning the above acquired property to the victim and embezzled it on his own idea.
B. On November 2016, the Defendant found one monitced a monitus monst, where the market price was lost by a person who was damaged by his name in the G near G in Suwon-si F, Suwon-si.
Defendant 1 did not take necessary procedures such as returning the above acquired property to the victim and embezzled it on his own idea.
(c)
On January 13, 2017, the Defendant found one Samsung Credit Card, which was lost by the victim H, in the vicinity of the Suwon bus base located in the border line in Suwon-si, Suwon-si, Suwon-si.
Defendant 1 did not take necessary procedures such as returning the above acquired property to the victim and embezzled it on his own idea.
2. On March 9, 2017, the Defendant attempted to commit fraud: (a) at the victim medical corporation J hospital located in Suwon-si, Suwon-si, the victim medical corporation Ja-si, and (b) received follow-up treatment and treatment by 119 rescue units; (c) as described in paragraph (c) 1-A, one credit card of the E-I Bank and one Samsung F&T of H, which was found as a legitimate holder; and (d) required K, an employee of the above hospital, to pay KRW 42,500 for medical expenses.
However, the defendant did not have the right to use the credit card because he did not have the right to use the credit card.
As a result, the Defendant attempted to deceiving the victim to escape the liability for the above medical expenses, but the credit card was already stolen and thus, did not bring the intent to avoid the settlement of the medical expenses.
Summary of Evidence
1..