The punishment of the accused shall be determined by imprisonment with prison labor for ten months.

However, the sentence shall be executed for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. On June 3, 2018, at around 18:30 on June 3, 2018, the Defendant: (a) brought a dispute with a person whose name cannot be known on the ground that he/she put his/her disease above the calculation unit of the class of the class of the class of the class of the class of the class of the class of the class of the class of the class of the class of the class of the class of the class of the class of the class of the class of the class of the class of the class of the class; and

“,” “A farch farch farch farch farb,” and “Cpar farb.”

“At the same time,” she opened a door with sound, and she did so for about three hours, so that customers in the place may get out of the door.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the victim's convenience store management by force.

2. On June 3, 2018, at the entrance of the convenience store as described in paragraph 1 at around 21:45 on June 3, 2018, the Defendant interfered with the management of the convenience store, as described in paragraph 1, and the Defendant sent G to the police officer G who was urged to return home from the police officer G belonging to the Seoul Dobong Police Station F District, which was dispatched upon receiving a report.

The attitude that gue gue seems to be able to see by the sound called “si far” was taken, and when G was taken one time the left face of G due to a handful hand that is recommended to return home from G to her home.

As a result, the defendant assaulted a police officer to interfere with the legitimate execution of duties by the police officer.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made to D or G;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a report on investigation (referring to the attachment of details of processing reported case to the 112 Report);

1. Relevant legal provisions of the Criminal Act, Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act, and Article 136 of the Criminal Act, and the choice of imprisonment, respectively;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 62-2 (1) of the Criminal Act, including observation of protection and community service order;

1. The sentencing criteria shall be based on;