A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On October 21, 2017, the Defendant, while drunking in front of the D convenience store located in Sanyang-gu, Sanyang-gu, Sanyang-si, Mayang-gu, 112, and sent to the site after receiving a report on 112, the Defendant took a bath to Fman F Officer who was recommended to return home from F Officer belonging to the E Zone belonging to the police station within the police station, and took a bath, such as “F Officer who is forced to grow up to boom,” and she took one time at the right side of Fman on the face of drinking.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate performance of official duties by police officers concerning 112 reporting management affairs.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of the law of the police statement protocol to F;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Act on the Suspension of Execution [the scope of recommendations given in the sentencing guidelines] - Fundamental area (the suspension of performance of official duties and the coercion of duties) (the decision of sentence in June 1 to June) (the decision of sentence] - Unfavorable circumstances: criminal records of the same kind. - Unfavorable circumstances: The defendant's mistake is recognized and reflectd, and criminal records of imprisonment without prison labor or any heavier punishment are not recognized.