A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. On February 13, 2016, the Defendant: (a) had the victim C’s electronic equipment sales store located in the 1st floor in Sung-nam-si, Ma-dong, Ma-dong, Ma-dong, Ma-dong, Ma-dong, with a large amount of mobile phone charges imposed on the victim; and (b) had the victim “Woo-gu, Ma-dong, Ma-dong, Ma-dong, Ma-dong, Ma-dong, Ma-dong, Ma-dong, Ma-dong, Ma-dong, Ma-dong, Ma-dong, Ma-dong, Ma-dong, Ma-dong, sent out of the facility sales store.”

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the victim's business of managing electronic equipment selling stores by force.

2. Around 19:00 on February 13, 2016, the Defendant obstructed the performance of official duties and the Defendant injured the victim’s be urged to return home from the victim F (30 years of age) who is the police officer belonging to the Sungnam Police Station E District Police Station E-gu, Sungnam Police Station called out after receiving the aforementioned report at the place indicated in paragraph 1 at around 19:00.

As a result, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers, and at the same time, inflicted an injury on the victim, such as internal infection with which the number of days of treatment can not be known.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police with regard to F;

1. C’s statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to diagnostic certificates and photographs;

1. Article 314 (1), Article 136 (1), and Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;

1. Selection of each sentence of imprisonment;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition on the grounds of not less than Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act (i.e., the fact that the crime in this case was committed by contingency, confession and reflect, the fact that the sentence was committed by violence, but has long been sentenced, and the fact that it was agreed with the victim C).