A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. On May 3, 2016, the Defendant: (a) demanded the victim to sit in company with the victim at the coffee shop “D” operated by the victim C at Hanam-si, Hanam-si on May 3, 2016; (b) however, as the victim refused to sit in company with the victim, the Defendant refused to sit in company with the victim “Ie, Ie, Ie, Ie, Ie, Ie, Ieland, Ie, Ie, Ieland, Ie the Marine Corps up to Vietnam;

I had been able to avoid disturbance for about 30 minutes because of the same year of education as this subject of education, it was so sound that it was about 30 minutes because it was "I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am."

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the operation of a coffee shop by force.

2. On May 3, 2016, the Defendant interfered with the performance of official duties, as described in paragraph 1 at the place described in paragraph 1 at around 20:10 on May 3, 2016, after receiving a report from the police officer F belonging to the Southern Police Station E District, who was called out after receiving a report, was urged to return home from the police officer F, who was called up, and was urged to return home from the police officer F, at the floor of hand, and after making one time the chest part of the above F was set back, the Defendant

“Along with the sound, I took the attitude that I would like to see the F.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties by police officers.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement with respect to C and F;

1. Application of the G’s written Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant Article 136 of the Criminal Act, Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act (the point of obstructing the performance of official duties), Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act (the point of obstructing duties) and the choice of imprisonment with prison labor for the crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. On the grounds for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act for the suspended sentence Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act, crimes 1 (Interference with Business) [the scope of recommending a person subject to special mitigation] committed in violation of Article 62(1) [the scope of recommending a person subject to special sentencing] and Article 62(1) [the scope of recommending a person subject to special sentencing] which have no basic area (from June to one year to six months] [the scope of recommending a person subject to special sentencing] [the scope of recommending a person subject to special mitigation] are subject to the aggravated punishment in cases where the degree of assault, intimidation, and deceptive scheme is minor.