The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The reasoning for the appeal (one year and two months of imprisonment) of the lower court is too unreasonable.

2. In full view of all the sentencing conditions, including the Defendant’s age, sex behavior, motive for the crime, frequency of the crime, method of the crime, method of the crime, circumstances after the crime, etc., the lower court’s punishment is too unreasonable, considering the following factors: (a) the Defendant’s age, sexual behavior, etc.; (b) the motive for the crime; (c) the number of times of the crime; and (d) the total amount of damage was not significantly significant; (d) the victim was punished several times for the same crime; (e) the victim’s structure was intruded during the period of repeated crime of the same kind; and (e) the victim was not repaid at night; and (e) the victim’s structure was not repaid.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.