The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The reasoning of the appeal is that of the lower court’s punishment (eight months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. In full view of all the sentencing conditions, such as the Defendant’s age, sex behavior, motive, frequency of the crime, method of the crime, circumstances after the crime, etc., the sentence of the lower court is too unreasonable, considering the following factors: (a) the Defendant is led to each of the instant crimes due to loan, etc.; (b) the amount of damage was not significant; (c) the family members are leading; (d) there were several times of punishment for the same kind of crime; (d) the victim’s property was stolen over several times; and (e) the victim’s property was stolen through disposal of stolen property; and (e) the disposal of stolen property was not easy to commit the crime; and (e) the sentencing conditions, such as the Defendant’s age, sex behavior, motive, frequency of the crime, method of the crime; and (e) the circumstances after the crime, etc.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.