The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The sentence of the court below (one year of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. In light of the nature and nature of the crime, environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime, etc., the sentence of the court below is deemed appropriate, and the defendant's aforementioned assertion is without merit, since it is acknowledged that the sentence of the court below is appropriate, since it is recognized that the defendant's punishment is appropriate in consideration of various conditions of sentencing as shown in the arguments, such as the defendant's age, character and behavior, environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime, and circumstances after the crime, etc., as it is deemed that the defendant committed the crime of this case without being able to commit the crime of this case, even though he was a repeated offender who has been sentenced to six months of imprisonment for the same kind of crime, and operated the illegal game site for about three months.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.