The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The decision of the court below (one year and six months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. According to the judgment, the defendant can have been punished for the same kind of crime including three times of punishment and one suspended sentence, and the defendant again committed the crime of this case without being among the persons who were punished for the same crime even during the period of repeated crime due to the same crime. The crime of this case is deemed to have purchased, delivered, and administered phiphonephones, and in light of its contents, the crime of this case is not likely to be committed and criminal, and the social danger and harm of narcotics crime are serious, as well as other various conditions of sentencing as shown in the arguments, such as the defendant's age, character, character, environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime, etc., the sentence of the court below is deemed to be appropriate, and the defendant's above assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.