The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The decision of the court below (one year and six months of imprisonment and two years of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. The judgment of the court below is found to have agreed with the victims of the crime of this case, but the defendant could have been punished for the same drug crime including four times of imprisonment and one suspended execution, and the defendant could have been punished for the same drug crime. The defendant again committed each of the crimes of this case without being convicted even though he is a repeated crime due to the same drug crime, and the crime of this case was committed again without being convicted. The crime of this case is very dangerous in light of its nature and criminal situation, and the crime of this case is handled two times of purchase, delivery, one time of medication, one-time of medication, and about 6g of Phphonephones. In light of its contents, the defendant handled the crime of this case with the character and criminal situation of the crime of this case, social danger and harm of the criminal of this case including the age, character, environment, motive, means, result, etc. of the crime of this case, the defendant's argument that the punishment of this case is appropriate after considering various circumstances after the crime of this case was committed.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.