The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The main point of the grounds for appeal is that the sentence of the court below (two years of probation in October, one hundred and sixty hours of community service order and forty hours of order to attend a lecture in 10 months) is too unreasonable.

2. According to the judgment, the defendant can be punished for the same traffic crime including two times of punishment, and the crime of this case is committed without a license, and the crime of this case causes an accident while driving with the driver without license, and in light of its contents, the nature and circumstances of the crime are bad, and the court below seems to have determined the punishment in consideration of all the circumstances favorable to the defendant, and the reason for mitigation of the punishment seems not to be the reason for mitigation, etc., as well as other various conditions of sentencing as shown in the arguments, such as the defendant's age, character and behavior, environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime, etc., the sentence of the court below is deemed appropriate. Thus, the defendant's above assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.