1. The Defendant’s decision on November 19, 2012 that rendered against the Plaintiff was revoked.

2...

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On August 3, 2009, the Defendant recognized the Plaintiff as a soldier or policeman on duty under Article 4(1)6 of the former Act on the Honorable Treatment and Support of Persons, etc. of Distinguished Services to the State (amended by Act No. 11029, Aug. 4, 201; hereinafter “Act on the Persons of Distinguished Services to the State”) by recognizing that the Plaintiff’s “alley-one-one-one-one-one-one executive member suffering from an accident during the reserve force training on May 25, 198 was wounded and disabled in performing official duties.

Accordingly, the plaintiff was under the physical examination under the same law, but was judged below the grade criteria.

B. After that, on April 10, 2012, the Plaintiff filed an application for registration of a person who rendered distinguished services to the State, alleging that there was a “multi-modal converging Madvergic Madvergic Madvergic Madvergic Madvergic (hereinafter “Madvergic Madvergic Ma”)” in the process of the treatment thereof, but the Defendant rejected it on the ground that there

(hereinafter referred to as "disposition of this case"). . [Grounds for recognition] The fact that there is no dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 4, 5, 8, Eul evidence Nos. 1 through 3 (including the number, hereinafter the same shall apply), the purport of the whole pleadings.

2. Whether the instant disposition is lawful

A. The Plaintiff’s assertion is unlawful in the instant disposition, based on the premise that there was no proximate causal relation between the instant wounds and the side effect of the instant surgery, on the ground that: (a) the Plaintiff was in a state where she was under the influence of her blood static and internal static surgery due to the injury of the “alley of the YAE executives,” which was recognized as an occupational injury; (b) the Plaintiff was under the influence of her return from 2005; and (c) the Plaintiff was under the influence of her return, and was under the influence of her return; (d) on October 6, 2009.

B. (i) On May 25, 198, the Plaintiff entered the mountain training of the reserve forces into the upper right peldi, which was hotly hotly hotly hotly hotly hotly hotly hotly hotly hotly hotly hotly hotly hotly hotly hotly hotly, and was carried out on May 31, 19

Dor. The plaintiff maintains a documentary evidence on the right edge and its origin.