beta
Text
1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
Reasons
1. Details of the disposition;
A. The plaintiff entered the Army on December 19, 1995 and was discharged from active service on March 31, 200 on the ground of the fall accident, and applied for registration of a person of distinguished service to the State on April 12, 2006 on the ground of the fall accident during the training, the plaintiff is a soldier or policeman of distinguished service to the State on April 12, 2006, who was registered as a soldier or policeman of distinguished service to the State on April 6, 2006, with "the state of his/her military service on the ground of the fall accident."
B. After that, the Plaintiff filed an application for additional recognition on September 30, 2013 due to the difference in the application for the “nives infection after the aftermath of both sides”. However, the Defendant rendered a disposition on May 2, 2014 on the basis of the review result of the Board of Patriots and Veterans Entitlement. The Plaintiff, dissatisfied with this, filed an administrative litigation with the Daejeon District Court Decision 2014Gudan927, and revoked the disposition corresponding to the requirements for additional status of persons who rendered distinguished services to the State for “after the aftermath of the aftermath of the math.”
’는 일부승소 판결을 받았으며, 위 판결은 그대로 확정되었다. 다. 이에 따라 실시된 재판정신체검사(2016. 1. 25.) 및 보훈심사위원회 상이등급 심의결과(2016. 6. 15.), 원고의 공상군경 요건 인정상이처 《좌 거골하 관절 강직(술후상태), 우 2,3,4 중족골 부위 골절, 좌측 주관절 탈구, 비골골절(비관혈적 정복술 후 상태), 요추(L4) 압박골절, 좌측 종골 골절(비관혈적 정복술 및 고정술 후 상태), 얼굴(우측 눈썹, 코, 입술) 열상(일차적 봉합술 후 상태), 우측 발목 부위 외상 후 관절염》에 대하여 ‘좌 거골하 관절 강직(술후상태), 비골골절(비관혈적 정복술 후 상태), 좌측 종골 골절 비관혈적 정복술 및 고정술 후...