1. The Defendant’s decision that rendered against the Plaintiff on September 3, 2012 as non-conforming to the requirements of a person of distinguished service to the State shall be revoked.

2...

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On December 7, 1970, the Plaintiff joined the Marine Corps for the Marine Corps and served in five rank units for the Marine Corps, and was discharged from military service on December 31, 1972.

B. On April 17, 2012, the Plaintiff filed an application with the Defendant for registration of a person who rendered distinguished services to the State on the ground that he/she applied for the “certificate of receipt” (hereinafter “instant wounds”).

C. On September 3, 2012, the Defendant rendered a non-specific decision-making disposition on the ground that objective data proving the proximate causal relationship between the instant injury and the military performance of official duties is not verified against the Plaintiff (hereinafter “instant disposition”).

【Ground of recognition】 The fact that there is no dispute, Gap evidence 1, Eul evidence 4 and 11, and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Whether the instant disposition is lawful

A. On October 21, 1971, the Plaintiff: (a) was admitted to the Marine Corps without any specific physical disorder; (b) was hospitalized in the National Armed Forces Capital Integration Hospital on October 21, 1971 because of the outbreak of urology, urology, and urology; and (c) on December 6, 1971, the Plaintiff was subject to collective assault for more than two hours on the ground that he was transferred from six inpatients on the same day to urology on the same day.

After that, the plaintiff was diagnosed as the wound of this case and was discharged from the hospital after being diagnosed as the wound of this case.

Therefore, since the causal relationship between the instant wounds and the Gun is recognized, the Defendant’s disposition of this case is unlawful.

B. Fact 1) On February 1971, 1971, the Plaintiff suffered from urology, urology, urology, and urology, and received treatment through the National Armed Forces Waterworks Integration Hospital from July 5, 1971 to September 15, 1971. There was no special opinion in view of the results of the examination, such as simple shooting, etc. at the time.

B. In other words, on October 21, 1971, the Plaintiff was suffering from the neutronic neutism, the horses, etc.