logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 2015.01.16 2014구합67
상이등급 신체검사 등급기준미달 처분취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On December 13, 2010, while the Plaintiff entered the Army and was performing military service, the Plaintiff sustained an injury, such as a softening on the left-hand part of the fore-hand side by conflicting with the other party, while engaging in a stable competition on September 10, 201.

B. On September 10, 201, the Plaintiff: (a) hospitalized in the Armed Forces Hongcheon Hospital; and (b) undergone emulsion and emulsion based on the diagnosis on the left-hand outside of the left-hand side of September 14, 201 and the diagnosis on damage to the body and human body; and (c) received emulsion removal surgery on November 8, 201.

On November 24, 2011, the Plaintiff sent back to the Armed Forces of the Armed Forces, received a stability fee, physical therapy, etc., and discharged the Plaintiff on January 12, 2012.

C. On August 19, 2012, the Plaintiff sustained an injury, such as pains and dives, on the left-hand side while moving to a living room in the future.

On August 20, 2012, the Plaintiff was hospitalized in the Armed Forces Hongcheon Hospital on August 20, 2012, and was subject to the blood static and internal static surgery on August 24, 2012 due to the examination of the aggregate of the 5th left-hand satisfaction, and was subject to the removal of internal stuffs on September 5, 2012.

On September 16, 2012, the Plaintiff discharged him from military service on the maturity date, and on September 25, 2012, the Plaintiff filed an application for registration of persons who have rendered distinguished services to the State with different rank on the left.

E. On December 27, 2012, the Defendant did not meet the requirements for registration of a person of distinguished service to the State under the Act on the Honorable Treatment and Support of Persons, etc. of Distinguished Service to the State (hereinafter “the Act”), but on January 21, 2013, the Defendant decided that the Plaintiff constitutes a person of distinguished service to the State under Article 2(1)2 of the Act on the Support for Persons of Distinguished Service to the State (hereinafter “the Act on the Honorable Treatment and Support of Persons of Distinguished Service to the State”). However, the Defendant’s determination that the Plaintiff constitutes a person of distinguished service to the State under Article 2(1)2 of the Act on the Support for Persons of Distinguished Service to the State (hereinafter “the Act on the Honorable Treatment and Support of Persons of Distinguished Service to the State”). However, the Defendant provided a new medical examination guidance accordingly.

F. On February 5, 2013, the Plaintiff received a new physical examination at the Busan Veterans Hospital.

However, the plaintiff's results of the above physical examination are different in this case.

arrow