logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2012.10.26 2012고단1863
관세법위반
Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment for two years, and Defendant B shall be punished by a fine of KRW 500 million, respectively.

However, the defendant A.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A The representative director of the B corporation and the defendant B corporation are corporations with the purpose of wholesale of aluminium.

When a person intends to import goods, he/she shall accurately report the description, specification, quantity, value, etc. of the relevant goods to the head of a customs office, and shall not import goods different from

1. On November 3, 2007, Defendant A filed an import declaration (import declaration number G) with the Busan Customs Office located in the central Dong of Jung-gu, Busan, and with the name of the corporation B, that Defendant A imported “Aluminum slum slumb” 4,559 kilograms of “Aluminum slum slumb” on which customs duties of 1%

However, in fact, the imported goods whose import declaration was made above were “Aluminium display” on which 8% customs duties are imposed in comparison with the import price.

The Defendant filed an import declaration of the above import declaration, and imported it from around October 7, 2009, as shown in the attached list of crimes (except No. 16 in the list of crimes, the dismissal of which was decided on August 29, 2012) from the time to October 7, 2009, on a total of 1,274,529,778 won of the cost of goods (the total market price of KRW 2,003,97,605 won) over 27 occasions, as shown in the attached list of crimes (excluding No. 16 in the list of crimes, the dismissal of which was decided on August 29, 2012).

2. The above Gap, the representative director of the defendant Eul corporation B, imported goods different from the actual imported goods by reporting the defendant's business at the above date and place.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each legal statement of the witness H, witness I, witness J, and witness K;

1. Each prosecutor's protocol of partial examination of the accused (including J and L's statement);

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol of M;

1. Each police statement made to I by the police officer's suspect interrogation protocol 1, N, H and J;

1. A certified copy of the review decision, each investigation report, customs clearance manual, import records, and other records;

arrow