logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구고등법원 2017.05.31 2016나26250
사해행위취소
Text

1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1...

Reasons

1. The reasons why this court should explain are the same as the part of the “basic facts” of the judgment of the first instance, except where the “this court” of the third five and twelve instances of the judgment of the first instance is respectively deemed to be the “Dong Branch Branch of the Daegu District Court”. Thus, this court shall accept it as it is in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. Determination as to the cause of action

A. 1) The following facts are established as to the existence of the preserved claim: Gap evidence Nos. 1, 2, 5, 6, and 8; Gap evidence Nos. 9-1 through 3; Gap evidence Nos. 10-1 through 5; Gap evidence Nos. 11 and 13; and Gap evidence Nos. 11 and 13. (A) The plaintiff and Eul set up on Jan. 28, 2010 the amount of money No. 320 million won at interest rate (1%); 12% after the date of borrowing; 30 million won after the date of borrowing; 2.4% interest rate per annum on Oct. 7, 2010; and 2.5% interest rate per annum No. 120 million (1%); and 2.5% interest rate per annum No. 2500, Dec. 21, 2012; and 3.5% interest rate per annum No. 9400, Feb. 14, 2000.

3. 0. 0. 11. 1. 1. 5, 00, 00, 00 C. 0. 1. 1. 1. 4, 201. 0. 5,00,00 E on November 23, 201, 200 C. 0. 04. 0. 1. 1. 1. 1. 1, 200, 300, 00 C. 1. 1. 1. 1. 1, 200, 204. 1. 1. 1. 1, 200, 203. 1. 1, 200, 300, 10. C. 1. 1. 1, 2004; 1. 1. 3. 1. 1, 200, 3. 1, 2000, 3003. 1. 3

arrow