logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2016.08.12 2015가합65397
대여금
Text

1. The Defendant’s KRW 325,00,000 as well as 5% per annum from December 1, 2015 to August 12, 2016 to the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. On August 2012, the Plaintiff and B concluded a partnership agreement with the purport of establishing and operating a corporation for the purpose of manufacturing construction materials manufacturing business.

B. The Plaintiff and B established the Defendant on January 15, 2013 in accordance with the foregoing business agreement.

C. From January 31, 2013 to July 30, 2014, the Plaintiff deposited KRW 355,000,000 in the Defendant’s National Bank account over 32 occasions as follows.

<표> 번호 일자 금액(원) 1 2013. 01. 31. 20,000,000 2 2013. 01. 31. 25,000,000 3 2013. 02. 15. 20,000,000 4 2013. 02. 28. 15,000,000 5 2013. 03. 15. 9,000,000 6 2013. 03. 20. 1,000,000 7 2013. 04. 01. 19,000,000 8 2013. 04. 10. 3,000,000 9 2013. 04. 15. 25,000,000 10 2013 04. 30. 3,000,000 11 2013. 05. 10. 5,000,000 12 2013. 05. 15. 15,000,000 13 2013. 05. 31. 5,000,000 14 2013. 06. 10. 5,000,000 15 2013. 06. 17. 23,000,000 16 2013. 07. 01. 4,000,000 17 2013. 07. 10. 3,000,000 18 2013. 07. 15. 32,000,000 19 2013. 07. 31. 4,500,000 20 2013. 08. 13. 6,000,000 21 2013. 08. 21. 24,000,000 22 2013. 09. 02 12,000,000 23 2013. 09. 10. 3,000,000 24 2013. 09. 16. 10,000,000 25 2013. 09. 30. 5,000,000 26 2013. 10. 15. 10,000,000 27 2013. 11. 15. 15,000,000 28 2014. 01. 15. 5,000,000 29 2014. 02. 03. 5,000,000 30 2014. 06. 02. 10,000,000 31 2014. 07. 10. 3,500,000 32 2014. 07. 30. 10,000,000 합 계 355,000,000 [인정근거] 다툼이 없는 사실, 갑 제1, 2, 4, 5호증 및 을 제1, 3, 4, 15호증(가지번호 있는 것은 가지번호 포함, 이하 같다)의 각 기재, 변론 전체의 취지

2. The Plaintiff asserted by the parties: (a) on January 31, 2013, the Plaintiff leased KRW 20 million to the Defendant on a 32-round July 30, 2014 by setting the interest rate of KRW 395,50,000 annually and at the end of the following month from the maturity date; (b) on October 30, 2013 and April 8, 2014, the Plaintiff was unable to receive the remainder of the loan that was paid a total of KRW 30 million from the Defendant; (c) as such, the Defendant was not given the remainder of the loan to the Plaintiff.

arrow