logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 청주지방법원 2017.07.13 2017고단551
도로교통법위반(음주운전)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On April 1, 2009, the Defendant was sentenced to a summary order of a fine of KRW 700,000 at the Cheongju District Court for a violation of the Road Traffic Act, and on September 25, 2013, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of two years for a crime of the Road Traffic Act at the Cheongju District Court for a violation of the Road Traffic Act.

1. On December 2, 2016, the Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act (unlicensed driving) driven a C-wing freight vehicle from the Do at the entrance of the petitioner-gu apartment B apartment at the Cheongju-si to the front road at the entrance of the B apartment at the Cheongju-si without obtaining a driver’s license on December 2, 2016.

2. The Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act (drinking driving) driven the C-wing truck at approximately 50 meters away from the Do at the entrance of the petition-gu B apartment to the front parking lot of the B-W apartment from the Do at the entrance of the Dong-gu, Cheongju to the 103-dong apartment, while under the influence of alcohol 0.177% during blood.

3. On December 2, 2016, the Defendant signed a letter of voluntary accompanying agreement prepared by E to avoid punishment when he/she was in control by driving under the same alcohol as stated in paragraph (2) at the police box of the police station having jurisdiction over the Cheongju Petition, the Defendant signed the signature of the above F name without authority for the purpose of exercising the authority by stating the “F” in the column for signature of the vehicle’s circumstantial report prepared by E to avoid punishment, the signature of the vehicle’s driver’s situation report, and the signature of the above F name in the portable device signature box of the notification of the result of drinking driving control.

4. The Defendant, at the time, at the time, at the place specified in paragraph (3) and at the same time, submitted to the above E each of the above E with the signature forged as if the signature of the above forged name was genuine, and had the aforementioned E file a voluntary accompanying agreement stating the forged signature, a statement report on the situation of the driver in charge, and a notice on the result of the crackdown on driving under the influence of alcohol with each of the above E, thereby exercising each of the above forged private signatures.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the interrogation of each police suspect against the accused;

1. Statement of the police statement related to G;

1. Inspector;

1.Written consent to voluntary accompanying, the circumstantial report of the driver involved;

arrow