A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. Around 02:20 on March 16, 2014, the Defendant driven a passenger vehicle with low alcohol level of 0.115% while under the influence of alcohol without a driver’s license, on the front road of a non-school located in the Changwon-si, Changwon-gu, Seoul Special Metropolitan City (3.15), and without a driver’s license, while driving a vehicle with low alcohol level of 0.115%.

2. The Defendant, at the above time and at the above place, demanded voluntary movement to a nearby Embling vehicle in order to measure drinking from a slope D belonging to the traffic control department of the Mapo-dong Police Station, which was under the influence of drinking at the same time and at the above place. In order to avoid the awareness of the fact during the suspension period of driver’s license, the Defendant, without authority, stated the “F” as a black pen in the written consent for voluntary movement without authority, and displayed it to the above D, who knew of such fact, as having been duly formed.

3. The Defendant violated the Resident Registration Act, at the above date, at the above place, notified the Defendant of his resident registration number of F, who was demanded to present his driver’s license, and the Defendant’s pro-friendly job offering F, who was in a usual place, as if the Defendant was the Defendant’s resident registration number.

4. In the driver’s opinion column of the driver’s statement report using a test of drinking alcohol at the above time, at the above location, the Defendant forged a private document, or uttering of a falsified document, stated “I had been able to do so. I have been able to do so too after the lapse of three hours,” and written “F” on the driver’s column, and then marked the Defendant’s unmanned on the back of the name, and presented it to the above D with no knowledge of the forgery.

Accordingly, the defendant, for the purpose of exercising a certificate of fact, forged the statement report on the situation of the host driver, which was in the name F, a private document concerning the certification of fact, and exercised it.

(i) the evidence;