logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2018.06.21 2018고단837
직무유기
Text

The sentence of punishment against the Defendants shall be suspended separately.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[2018 Height group 837] - Defendant A served as the head of the road management and pedestrian environment improvement team of the construction and transportation bureau of the Seoul D office. From May 1, 201 to January 17, 2016, Defendant A served in the road and road management team of the construction and transportation bureau of the Seoul E office from May 1, 201.

The Defendant, as a supervisor of construction work, was responsible for the management and supervision of the successful bidder in accordance with the design documents, specifications, and work instruction standards, and whether there is no illegal subcontracting, or whether there is no nominal lending construction.

On March 19, 2013, the Defendant discovered that the said construction work in Korea, which was launched in Seoul E-Gu Office, was performed in the name of another successful bidder company in violation of the Framework Act on the Construction Industry, and that GH had been performed in the name of another successful bidder company. As such, the Defendant took necessary measures, such as accusation and restriction on bidding

Despite the need to take any action, the court did not take any action with the implied consent.

In addition, from around that time to December 31, 2015, the Defendant did not take any measures in relation to F ordered by E Office as indicated in the list of crimes as follows, with the knowledge that G used the trade name of the successful bidder.

Accordingly, the defendant has deserted his duties without justifiable reasons.

- Following- On March 19, 2013 from March 19, 2013 to December 31, 2013 of the contract date of the contractor awarded an order for construction project during the annual construction schedule, the following: (a) the contractor did not take any measures under the name of the Defendant’s bid-related corporation, despite being aware of the fact that he/she used the construction work’s name on March 19, 2014 to December 31, 2014 from March 19, 2014 to December 31, 2014; (b) G (State representative K) on March 17, 2014 (State representative director) 3, 2015 to December 31, 2015 (State representative director)’s representative director at the NA (State representative) at the construction site; and (c) the Defendant did not take any measures under the name of the Defendant’s auction-related corporation (H) at the construction site.

1. Defendant B is Seoul.

arrow