Defendant

A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for six months, and by a fine of three million won.

However, as to Defendant A, this shall not apply.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A From 2015 to 2015, Seoul is a public official of Grade VII belonging to the Bupyeong-gu Office of Civil Works and F, and Defendant B is a site manager of G Co., Ltd., a person ordered by the Eunpyeong-gu Office from 2015 to 2017.

1. Defendant A

A. The Defendant, as a supervisor of the construction project of Eunpyeong-gu “H” that places an order at the office road division, was in charge of managing and supervising the construction project in accordance with the design books, specifications, and work instruction standards at the successful bidder company, and whether there is no illegal subcontracting, or whether there is no nominal lending construction.

(1) On February 22, 2016, the Defendant ordered the Eunpyeong-gu Seoul Office to “H in 2016,” which was awarded a successful bid by the JJ, did not take any measures despite being aware of the fact that Defendant B, etc., a co-defendant, etc., a site warden of G, in violation of the Framework Act on the Construction Industry and performed the construction work in the name of

(2) On February 17, 2017, the Defendant ordered the Eunpyeong-gu Seoul Office to “H in 2017,” which was awarded a successful bid by the JJ, did not take any measures despite being aware of the fact that Defendant B, etc., a co-defendant, etc., who was a site warden of G, violated the Framework Act on the Construction Industry and performed the construction work under the name of J

Accordingly, the defendant has deserted his duties twice throughout the two times without justifiable reasons.

B. On September 2016, the Defendant: (a) was on the street in front of the Eunpyeong-gu Seoul apartment site and worked at the Eunpyeong-gu Office for the joint Defendant B on the top of the steering force of the sports vehicle in Eunpyeong-gu, Seoul; (b) the Co-Defendant B, in relation to “H in 2016,” stated that “the construction continues to be well-known” under the pretext of changing the implied recognition of the fact of lending the name and the convenience of construction; and (c) 2 million won in cash (40 million won only) was put into the Nonghyup Bank’s envelope and received the delivery thereof.

(2) The Defendant goes to work at Eunpyeong-gu Office on January 23, 2017 in the same manner as, and in the same place as, the foregoing paragraph (1).