logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2015.11.17 2015누52199
변상금부과처분취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

Reasons

1. The reasoning for the court’s explanation concerning this case is as follows: (a) and (f) of the part concerning the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, which are the part concerning the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, is identical to the part concerning the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance except for the addition of the foregoing, and thus, it is acceptable in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

E. The location of the part of the instant land possessed by the Plaintiff is identical to the indication of “unauthorized possession place” in the attached photograph.

F. Meanwhile, the Seoul Urban Railroad Workers’ Union, which was the Plaintiff, was merged on June 10, 2015 with the Seoul Urban Railroad Workers’ Union on June 10, 2015, and 5678 Seoul Urban Railroad Workers’ Union, filed an application to resume the lawsuit.

(hereinafter referred to as "Plaintiff"). 3. Conclusion, the plaintiff's claim is dismissed as it is without merit, and the judgment of the court of first instance with the same conclusion is just, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow