beta
Text
1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.
Purport of claim and appeal
1..
Reasons
1. The reasoning of the court’s explanation concerning this case is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the addition of the following two paragraphs, and thus, the same shall be cited in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main text of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.
2. Details to be added; and
A. Reasons for the judgment of the court of the first instance
As a result of the fact-finding conducted by this Court, since the contents to be added to the end of the item were not observed in brain CT on July 12, 2012, the two parts of the two parts, the two parts of the two parts, the two parts of the two parts, or other parts of the body have not been observed. Therefore, the possibility of the pre-explosion is relatively low. (B) part of the reasoning of the judgment of the first instance court (hereinafter “5. Judgment”), which is added to the end of the first instance judgment, 4) the instant accident was committed while receiving nursing benefits for the management of the post-exploitation after the completion of the medical care for the Plaintiff, while receiving nursing benefits for the management of the post-exploitation, the Defendant claimed that there was no causal relationship between the instant accident and the instant accident occurred in the area of private life, which is not recognized under the Industrial Accident Insurance Act, and there was no causal relationship in the instant case.
The issue of whether it constitutes an occupational accident is determined according to the cause of the accident, and it is not determined according to the place where the accident occurred. Thus, the defendant's above assertion is without merit.
(3) The plaintiff's claim is justified and the judgment of the court of first instance that held that the plaintiff's claim is justified, and thus, the defendant's appeal is justified. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices.