beta
Cases
2019Nu37181 The increased amount of compensation for confinement
Plaintiff Appellant
1. A;
2. B
3. C
Attorney Kim Jae-hoon, Counsel for the plaintiff-appellant
Defendant Elives
Korea Highway Corporation
Government Legal Service Corporation (Law Firm LLC)
Attorney Choi Jin-jin
The first instance judgment
Suwon District Court Decision 2015Guhap8492 Decided January 29, 2019
Conclusion of Pleadings
July 9, 2019
Imposition of Judgment
September 10, 2019
Text
1. The plaintiffs' appeal and the claims of plaintiffs A and B expanded by this court are dismissed, respectively. The costs of lawsuit after the appeal are assessed against the plaintiffs.
Purport of claim and appeal
The judgment of the first instance is modified as follows. The defendant shall pay to the plaintiff Gap and Eul 300,000,000 won each of them, 93,54,177 won each of them, and 15% interest per annum from the day following the day of service of the copy of the complaint of this case to the day of complete payment (the plaintiff Gap and Eul extended their claims while filing an appeal).
Reasons
1. Quotation of the first instance judgment
The reasoning for this case is that the court's reasoning is stated in the reasoning of the first instance judgment, except for the case where "this court" is dismissed as "court of the first instance" and "this judgment" in the 7th sentence of the first instance judgment as "court of the first instance" and "the first instance judgment" in the 7th sentence of the first instance judgment as "the first instance judgment". Thus, this case's argument is accepted as it is in accordance with Article 8 (2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act (the argument that the plaintiff submitted in the first instance trial is not significantly different from that that of the first instance court, and the first instance court's judgment rejecting the plaintiffs' assertion is legitimate even if
2. Conclusion
Therefore, the judgment of the court of first instance is justifiable. Thus, the plaintiffs' appeal and the claims of plaintiffs A and B expanded by this court are dismissed as they are without merit.
Judges
The presiding judge, appointed judge;
Judge Park Jong-soo
Judges Han Young-young