logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2019.09.10 2019누37181
수용보상금 증액
Text

1. The plaintiffs' appeal and the claims of plaintiffs A and B expanded by this court are dismissed, respectively.

2. After an appeal is filed.

Reasons

1. The reasons for this Court concerning this case are as follows: (a) each of the judgment of the first instance is dismissed by the court of the first instance as “court of the first instance”; and (b) in the 7th sentence of the judgment of the first instance, “this judgment” is identical to the reasoning of the judgment of the first instance, except where “the court of the first instance” is deemed to be “the court of the first instance”; and (c) thus, it shall be cited in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main sentence of Article

(2) The court of first instance, which rejected the plaintiffs' assertion, is justifiable, even if the plaintiff's assertion was not significantly different from the allegations made in the first instance trial, and the evidence submitted in the first instance and the first instance trial were re-examineed). 2. In conclusion, the judgment of the first instance is legitimate, and thus, the plaintiffs' appeal and the claims of the plaintiff A and B expanded in this court are dismissed as they are without merit.

arrow